This is only an excerpt of the post. To access the entire contents of this post, please login or click here to Register.
This entry was posted
on Monday, January 19th, 2009 at 10:37 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Just finished watching the video. In hunting for keywords, is it really very important that - besides going for those with high search volumes and low competing web pages - we should also go for those with a lot of sponsored links in Google?
How important is this factor? What if a certain keyword has high search volume and low competing pages, yet has little or zero sponsored links?
Shall we still use them? Thanks ahead for the answer!
January 20th, 2009 at 9:56 am
Hi, Jeremy,
Just finished watching the video. In hunting for keywords, is it really very important that - besides going for those with high search volumes and low competing web pages - we should also go for those with a lot of sponsored links in Google?
How important is this factor? What if a certain keyword has high search volume and low competing pages, yet has little or zero sponsored links?
Shall we still use them? Thanks ahead for the answer!
[Reply]
Jeremy Reply:
January 20th, 2009 at 1:01 pm
Razorblade,
The presence of the paid ads lets us know that the keywords have some commercial intent behind them.
However, if you find a word with no ads running, usually the competition is so low that it won’t hurt to give it a shot and see what happens.
[Reply]
January 20th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
I have dumb question. What are there so called Web 2.0 sites you said we should be looking for to see if we can rank as well.
What the Web 2.0 sites they we want to see?
[Reply]
Jeremy Reply:
January 20th, 2009 at 1:02 pm
RD,
When I talk about 2.0 sites, I’m referring to sites like Squidoo, hubpages, zimbio, digg, and other sites like that.
[Reply]
January 20th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
Thanks
[Reply]